Mr. Rizzardi disagreed with just one point regarding the 33 trees. According to the |
|
ordinance, if any portion of a dripline is within the proposed improvements, that tree |
|
has to be replaced; the applicant maintains that if it’s just a portion of the dripline it |
|
won’t be affected. Typically most tree roots extend beyond the dripline. The |
|
landscape consultant believes those 33 trees will not survive; she is not advocating |
|
destroying living trees. Regarding wire mesh fencing, Mr. Rizzardi understands that it |
|
is more durable than snow fencing which frequently is knocked or blown down, |
|
eliminating any tree protection. Wire mesh fencing tends to remain throughout the |
|
entire building process, not just the development process. Snow fencing is typically 3 |
|
feet in height; wire mesh is typically 5 feet in height. |
|
Commissioner Rosen and Mr. Potere summarized the tree counts as follows, on which |
|
the applicant and staff agree: Construction of roads, easements, rights-of-way will |
|
require the removal of 123 trees. All 92 trees within the house clearing limits, which |
|
are the reduced building envelopes, are considered cut down whether they are or not, |
|
and whether they survive or not. Even if some of those 92 trees are saved, the |
|
applicant will not get credit toward replacement. Of the remaining 71 trees in the |
|
building envelopes, the applicant will provide a two year bond to guarantee |
|
replacement if they are impacted by subdivision improvements. There are 34 trees on |
|
the west side of Brewster Road that may be required to be removed depending on the |
|
position taken by Council. Linda Lemke determined there are 33 trees scattered |
|
throughout the development whose driplines might be impacted by slight |
|
encroachments by sidewalks, etc. and asked that they be included. It is those 33 |
|