|
Administration and Information |
|
Services Committee |
Rochester Hills
|
1000 Rochester Hills |
|
Drive |
|
Rochester Hills, MI 48309 |
|
Home Page: |
|
www.rochesterhills.org |
Minutes
|
John L. Dalton, April Feng, Bob Grace, Melinda Hill, Barbara Holder, Bev Jasinski, |
|
Stephen Kirksey, Pam Lee, Jennifer Stein, Gerard Verschueren |
4:00 PM
1000 Rochester Hills Drive
Tuesday, March 1, 2005
CALL TO ORDER
|
Chairperson Holder called the Administration and Information Services Committee |
|
meeting to order at 4:07 p.m. |
ROLL CALL
Melinda Hill, John Dalton, Barbara Holder and Stephen Kirksey
Present:
Gerard Verschueren
Absent:
|
Non-Voting Members Present: Bob Grace, Bev Jasinski, Pam Lee, April Feng and |
|
Jennifer Stein |
|
Non-Voting Members Absent: None |
|
Jane Leslie, Deputy Clerk |
|
Committee Member Verschueren provided previous notice that he would be unable to |
|
attend and asked to be excused. |
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
2005-0132
Regular Meeting - February 1, 2005
Min AIS 020105.pdf
|
A motion was made by Dalton, seconded by Hill, that this matter be Approved. |
|
Resolved that the Administration and Information Services Committee hereby |
|
approves the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 1, 2005 as presented. |
|
The motion carried by the following vote: |
Aye:
Hill, Dalton, Holder and Kirksey
Absent:
Verschueren
COMMUNICATIONS
None.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
2004-0667
|
Discussion Regarding Creation of a Proposed Committee to Promote |
|
Communication with Local Businesses |
Referral Notice.pdf; Min CC Draft 080404.pdf
|
Ms. Linda Davis-Kirksey and Mr. William Connellan of the Greater Rochester |
|
Chamber of Commerce described creating a Chamber committee consisting of a |
|
member from each of the three (3) member communities (Rochester, Rochester Hills |
|
and Oakland Township), and four (4) Chamber members, as well as Ms. Davis-Kirksey |
|
and Mr. Connellan as co-chairs. The main focus of the Committee would be economic |
|
development, but they felt that the suggestion of promoting communication between |
|
businesses and local government could also be addressed. They suggested that if the |
|
Chamber's new Committee also meets this criteria, it would eliminate the possible |
|
redundancy of Rochester Hills creating a new committee. |
|
Ms. Hill noted that the Administration & Information Services (AIS) Committee's original |
|
concept was a committee that would meet quarterly to provide "an open discussion |
|
forum for businesses to address issues with our City." She stressed that the idea was |
|
for business people to have access to City administrative staff members and Council |
|
members on an informal level. |
|
The Chamber representatives suggested that the new committee could offer that as a |
|
component of their overall purpose, noting that the Chamber could serve as the "conduit |
|
system" for communication with local business people. |
|
Noting that Council members are not as accessible as City administrative staffers, AIS |
|
Committee members recommended that the new Chamber committee include a City |
|
staff member and an elected official as representatives from each community |
|
Ms. Davis-Kirksey and Mr. Connellan thanked AIS Committee members for their |
|
feedback and assured Chairperson Holder that they would contact her once the |
|
Chamber evaluated their feedback. Ms. Davis-Kirksey asked that, in the interim, the |
|
AIS Committee consider who they would like to appoint to the new Chamber committee. |
Discussed
2005-0097
Annual Class C Inspection Report - 2005
|
Memo Leslie.pdf; List of Class C Licenses.pdf; Bldg Dept Report.pdf; |
|
Heath Dept Reports1.pdf; Heath Dept Reports2.pdf; Heath Dept |
|
Reports3.pdf; Heath Dept Reports4.pdf; Ltr Chuck E Cheese 021805.pdf; |
|
Ltr Olive Garden 021805.pdf |
|
Ms. Jane Leslie, Deputy Clerk, explained that the violations previously noted have been |
|
corrected and that the Building Department's report was actually delayed and Chuck E. |
|
Cheese's had been in compliance with regard to their electrical violations at the time of |
|
the previous AIS Committee meeting. |
|
Mr. Eric Hrit appeared before the Committee on behalf of Chuck E. Cheese's and was |
|
advised by Committee members that it is essential that violations be addressed in an |
|
expeditious fashion to avoid placing their liquor license in jeopardy. |
|
Mr. Ken Bissonnette appeared before the AIS Committee and identified himself as the |
|
General Manager of The Olive Garden restaurant in question. He noted that he only |
|
recently assumed this position and, in effect, inherited the situation from his |
|
predecessor. He noted that the delays in addressing the violations were exacerbated by |
|
misinformation from their private contractor and delays resulting from communicating |
|
between the restaurant itself and the corporate headquarters. |
|
Mr. Dalton noted that "it's obvious that you're doing what you possibly can" to address |
|
the situation. |
|
Ms. Hill stressed that, in the future, it would be wise to have any such outstanding |
|
issues resolved prior to the yearly inspection. |
|
Mr. Bissonnette assured the Committee that he would keep Ms. Leslie informed as to |
|
the progress of this outstanding matter. |
Discussed
NEW BUSINESS
2005-0163
Liquor License - Revised Application
|
Agenda Summary.pdf; Liquor License Application 2005.pdf; Draft Min AIS |
|
030105.pdf; Revised Liq License App.pdf; 0163 Resolution.pdf |
|
Ms. Bev Jasinski, City Clerk, presented the first draft of the new liquor license |
|
application. Committee members offered the following suggestions, noting that the |
|
application should request the following: |
|
* Information on whether the applicant has ever operated a restaurant. |
|
* A history of liquor violations dating back ten (10) years rather than five (5). |
|
* A description, in the applicants own words, of the "value to the community" the |
|
establishment would provide. |
|
* The applicant's personal or business (whichever is most applicable) financial |
|
statements for the past two (2) years. |
|
* A list of the various food and liquor certifications completed by managers and |
|
employees. |
|
* A description of the type or "character" of the proposed establishment. |
Discussed
|
Enactment No: RES0125-2005 |
2005-0168
Discussion of City Council Pay Periods
Memo Strate 022405.pdf; Memos Galeczka CC Payroll.pdf
|
Mr. Dalton noted that there are certain months when the time frame for submitting |
|
Council time sheets is short and a missed deadline results in a long delay in receiving a |
|
paycheck. He suggested that Council members be paid bi-weekly. |
|
Ms. Susan Galeczka, City Council Liaison, explained that whatever pay classification |
|
Council chooses, they must all adhere to that schedule for the entire year. Because |
|
Council is currently paid on the first payday of the month, individual members cannot |
|
occasionally be paid on the second payday if their time sheets are received after the |
|
deadline. |
|
Ms. Hill noted that a bi-weekly pay period would result in more paperwork and deadlines |
|
for both Council members and City staff. She stressed that it is the responsibility of |
|
Council members to submit their time sheets on time. |
|
The consensus of the Committee was to maintain the current Council pay period of the |
|
first payday of each month. |
|
(Mr. Kirksey Departed at 5:05 p.m.) |
Discussed
YOUTH COMMENTS
None.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
|
Ms. Holder explained that she had requested information from the Human Resources |
|
Department regarding how many employees were hired and in what positions, whether |
|
they were full- or part-time positions, and if they were new or replacement positions |
|
spanning the previous eight (8) to twelve (12) months. She then expanded this request |
|
to clarify whether unfilled positions are being budgeted. |
|
Ms. Pam Lee, Director of Human Resources, stated, "You usually budget based on how |
|
the position is filled in the preceding year." Therefore, if a position was not filled in 2003, |
|
it will not be budgeted in 2004. |
|
Committee members expressed confusion that positions listed in the Index of the |
|
Budget book do not coincide with positions listed elsewhere in the Budget. |
|
It was unclear which positions were budgeted and which were not. It was suggested |
|
that the Financial Services Committee discuss the matter further. |
NEXT MEETING DATE
Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 4:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
|
There being no further business to discuss, Chairperson Holder adjourned the meeting |
|
at 5:30 p.m. |
|
Minutes prepared by Margaret Strate. |
|
Minutes were approved as presented at the June 7, 2005 Regular Administration and |
|
Information Services Committee Meeting. |