Administration and Information |
Services Committee |
Rochester Hills
1000 Rochester Hills |
Drive |
Rochester Hills, MI 48309 |
Home Page: |
www.rochesterhills.org |
Minutes
John L. Dalton, April Feng, Bob Grace, Melinda Hill, Barbara Holder, Bev Jasinski, |
Stephen Kirksey, Pam Lee, Jennifer Stein, Gerard Verschueren |
4:00 PM
1000 Rochester Hills Drive
Tuesday, March 1, 2005
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Holder called the Administration and Information Services Committee |
meeting to order at 4:07 p.m. |
ROLL CALL
Melinda Hill, John Dalton, Barbara Holder and Stephen Kirksey
Present:
Gerard Verschueren
Absent:
Non-Voting Members Present: Bob Grace, Bev Jasinski, Pam Lee, April Feng and |
Jennifer Stein |
Non-Voting Members Absent: None |
Jane Leslie, Deputy Clerk |
Committee Member Verschueren provided previous notice that he would be unable to |
attend and asked to be excused. |
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
2005-0132
Regular Meeting - February 1, 2005
Min AIS 020105.pdf
A motion was made by Dalton, seconded by Hill, that this matter be Approved. |
Resolved that the Administration and Information Services Committee hereby |
approves the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 1, 2005 as presented. |
The motion carried by the following vote: |
Aye:
Hill, Dalton, Holder and Kirksey
Absent:
Verschueren
COMMUNICATIONS
None.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
2004-0667
Discussion Regarding Creation of a Proposed Committee to Promote |
Communication with Local Businesses |
Referral Notice.pdf; Min CC Draft 080404.pdf
Ms. Linda Davis-Kirksey and Mr. William Connellan of the Greater Rochester |
Chamber of Commerce described creating a Chamber committee consisting of a |
member from each of the three (3) member communities (Rochester, Rochester Hills |
and Oakland Township), and four (4) Chamber members, as well as Ms. Davis-Kirksey |
and Mr. Connellan as co-chairs. The main focus of the Committee would be economic |
development, but they felt that the suggestion of promoting communication between |
businesses and local government could also be addressed. They suggested that if the |
Chamber's new Committee also meets this criteria, it would eliminate the possible |
redundancy of Rochester Hills creating a new committee. |
Ms. Hill noted that the Administration & Information Services (AIS) Committee's original |
concept was a committee that would meet quarterly to provide "an open discussion |
forum for businesses to address issues with our City." She stressed that the idea was |
for business people to have access to City administrative staff members and Council |
members on an informal level. |
The Chamber representatives suggested that the new committee could offer that as a |
component of their overall purpose, noting that the Chamber could serve as the "conduit |
system" for communication with local business people. |
Noting that Council members are not as accessible as City administrative staffers, AIS |
Committee members recommended that the new Chamber committee include a City |
staff member and an elected official as representatives from each community |
Ms. Davis-Kirksey and Mr. Connellan thanked AIS Committee members for their |
feedback and assured Chairperson Holder that they would contact her once the |
Chamber evaluated their feedback. Ms. Davis-Kirksey asked that, in the interim, the |
AIS Committee consider who they would like to appoint to the new Chamber committee. |
Discussed
2005-0097
Annual Class C Inspection Report - 2005
Memo Leslie.pdf; List of Class C Licenses.pdf; Bldg Dept Report.pdf; |
Heath Dept Reports1.pdf; Heath Dept Reports2.pdf; Heath Dept |
Reports3.pdf; Heath Dept Reports4.pdf; Ltr Chuck E Cheese 021805.pdf; |
Ltr Olive Garden 021805.pdf |
Ms. Jane Leslie, Deputy Clerk, explained that the violations previously noted have been |
corrected and that the Building Department's report was actually delayed and Chuck E. |
Cheese's had been in compliance with regard to their electrical violations at the time of |
the previous AIS Committee meeting. |
Mr. Eric Hrit appeared before the Committee on behalf of Chuck E. Cheese's and was |
advised by Committee members that it is essential that violations be addressed in an |
expeditious fashion to avoid placing their liquor license in jeopardy. |
Mr. Ken Bissonnette appeared before the AIS Committee and identified himself as the |
General Manager of The Olive Garden restaurant in question. He noted that he only |
recently assumed this position and, in effect, inherited the situation from his |
predecessor. He noted that the delays in addressing the violations were exacerbated by |
misinformation from their private contractor and delays resulting from communicating |
between the restaurant itself and the corporate headquarters. |
Mr. Dalton noted that "it's obvious that you're doing what you possibly can" to address |
the situation. |
Ms. Hill stressed that, in the future, it would be wise to have any such outstanding |
issues resolved prior to the yearly inspection. |
Mr. Bissonnette assured the Committee that he would keep Ms. Leslie informed as to |
the progress of this outstanding matter. |
Discussed
NEW BUSINESS
2005-0163
Liquor License - Revised Application
Agenda Summary.pdf; Liquor License Application 2005.pdf; Draft Min AIS |
030105.pdf; Revised Liq License App.pdf; 0163 Resolution.pdf |
Ms. Bev Jasinski, City Clerk, presented the first draft of the new liquor license |
application. Committee members offered the following suggestions, noting that the |
application should request the following: |
* Information on whether the applicant has ever operated a restaurant. |
* A history of liquor violations dating back ten (10) years rather than five (5). |
* A description, in the applicants own words, of the "value to the community" the |
establishment would provide. |
* The applicant's personal or business (whichever is most applicable) financial |
statements for the past two (2) years. |
* A list of the various food and liquor certifications completed by managers and |
employees. |
* A description of the type or "character" of the proposed establishment. |
Discussed
Enactment No: RES0125-2005 |
2005-0168
Discussion of City Council Pay Periods
Memo Strate 022405.pdf; Memos Galeczka CC Payroll.pdf
Mr. Dalton noted that there are certain months when the time frame for submitting |
Council time sheets is short and a missed deadline results in a long delay in receiving a |
paycheck. He suggested that Council members be paid bi-weekly. |
Ms. Susan Galeczka, City Council Liaison, explained that whatever pay classification |
Council chooses, they must all adhere to that schedule for the entire year. Because |
Council is currently paid on the first payday of the month, individual members cannot |
occasionally be paid on the second payday if their time sheets are received after the |
deadline. |
Ms. Hill noted that a bi-weekly pay period would result in more paperwork and deadlines |
for both Council members and City staff. She stressed that it is the responsibility of |
Council members to submit their time sheets on time. |
The consensus of the Committee was to maintain the current Council pay period of the |
first payday of each month. |
(Mr. Kirksey Departed at 5:05 p.m.) |
Discussed
YOUTH COMMENTS
None.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Ms. Holder explained that she had requested information from the Human Resources |
Department regarding how many employees were hired and in what positions, whether |
they were full- or part-time positions, and if they were new or replacement positions |
spanning the previous eight (8) to twelve (12) months. She then expanded this request |
to clarify whether unfilled positions are being budgeted. |
Ms. Pam Lee, Director of Human Resources, stated, "You usually budget based on how |
the position is filled in the preceding year." Therefore, if a position was not filled in 2003, |
it will not be budgeted in 2004. |
Committee members expressed confusion that positions listed in the Index of the |
Budget book do not coincide with positions listed elsewhere in the Budget. |
It was unclear which positions were budgeted and which were not. It was suggested |
that the Financial Services Committee discuss the matter further. |
NEXT MEETING DATE
Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 4:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, Chairperson Holder adjourned the meeting |
at 5:30 p.m. |
Minutes prepared by Margaret Strate. |
Minutes were approved as presented at the June 7, 2005 Regular Administration and |
Information Services Committee Meeting. |