Ms. Goodwin addressed the historic designation and rezoning issues |
|
together. The subject parcel was recently purchased by the Road |
|
Commission for Oakland County in conjunction with the Livernois Road |
|
improvements. The parent parcel was originally one acre in size. A 0.12 |
|
acre portion was recently rezoned to B-2, General Business and then |
|
combined with the existing shopping center on Walton Boulevard to replace |
|
parking spaces lost due to the widening of Livernois Road. The applicant |
|
believes that the highest and best use of the property is for permitted O-1 |
|
uses. No specific users or plans have been identified at this time. Ms. |
|
Goodwin reviewed the principal permitted uses and conditional uses |
|
permitted under the current zoning of R-2, One Family Residential and the |
|
proposed zoning of O-1, Office Business. There appears to be sufficient |
|
land area to support either a single family use or a small professional office |
|
as well as other permitted uses under either zoning classification. The |
|
larger permitted uses would not be feasible because of the limited land |
|
area available and the development requirements that would have to be |
|
met. The Master Plan designates the subject site as single family |
|
residential. However, it was recognized in previous applications for a |
|
rezoning of this property that these changes could have some bearing on |
|
the future use of the property. The existing topography and the change in |
|
orientation to the new right-of-way for access purposes would have an |
|
impact on the practicality of the future use under the Master Plan’s land use |
|
designation. The office zoning classification can be used to provide a |
|
transitional land use from the more intense uses typically found at the |
|
intersections of major thoroughfares. There do appear to be unique |
|
circumstances in the orientation of the lot and its relationship to the |
|
adjoining shopping center driveway, the right-of-way, and the Livernois |
|
frontage that would warrant a deviation from the strict interpretation of the |
|
adopted land use designation for this property. |
|