Mr. Delacourt commented the property is incorporated in an approved Planned Unit |
|
Development, City Place, a dense large-scale mixed use development consisting of |
|
office and residential, with a small amount of retail allowed in some of the Rochester |
|
Road facing buildings. The question before the Commission is the same as with the |
|
other properties, only this recommendation does have the ability to impact the Land Use |
|
Plan. Discussions have ensued between the applicant and City Council relative to a |
|
revised PUD, and as such, this designation does have an impact on documents relating |
|
to land use. If Council decides not to delist the district, a discussion regarding the future |
|
land use will occur and the PUD would still have to incorporate a designated property. |
|
Mr. Delacourt suggested the Commission may want to add a condition acknowledging |
|
they are aware the property is part of an approved PUD agreement. The preliminary |
|
report’s recommendation is to delist the property as it no longer meets the criteria for |
|
designation. The PUD, if modified, would return to the Planning Commission for |
|
discussion and public hearing. Mr. Delacourt offered to answer any questions. |
|