| Members Rosen and Boswell attended the CIP committee meeting last week. |
|
| Member Rosen stated that the next step in the CIP process is to select those projects |
|
| that will progress from the "wish list" stage to what can be done, what should be done, |
|
| what is fundable. The big spreadsheet distributed to all commissioners represents |
|
| what we want to do. What has happened so far is that the Average Rating has been |
|
| compiled. The projects have not been rated yet in terms of highest to lowest rated, |
|
| but it at least provides a reference point. The committee is at the stage of narrowing |
|
| down the list from "want to do", "should do", "can do", and finally "will do" based on |
|
| what City Council approves. The committee did discuss some of the issues that were |
|
| brought up, such as the roads and the family aquatic center, identified as PK-2. The |
|
| project total is $10,030,000; the city's share is $10,030,000; dollars spent through |
|
| 1998 $30,000; funded in 1999 $10 million. On its face that sounds like a very tall |
|
| order when the aquatic center is unlikely to be built in 1999, but we probably can do it |
|
| if the money is appropriated. The committee is now looking for feedback from the |
|
| Planning Commission in terms of any possible omissions or items that should be |
|
| removed. Mr. Dohr concurred with Member Rosen's evaluation. |
|
