|
Community Development & Viability |
|
Committee |
Rochester Hills
|
1000 Rochester Hills |
|
Drive |
|
Rochester Hills, MI 48309 |
|
Home Page: www. |
|
rochesterhills.org |
Minutes
|
Ed Anzek, Bryan Barnett, Scott Cope, Frank Cosenza, Barbara Holder, Jim Duistermars, |
|
Michael Kaszubski, Erin Mozer, Roger Rousse, Katie Talbert, Mark Witte |
5:30 PM
1000 Rochester Hills Drive
Thursday, April 28, 2005
CALL TO ORDER
|
Chairperson Barnett called the Regular Community Development & Viability Committee |
|
meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. |
ROLL CALL
Bryan Barnett, Jim Duistermars, Barbara Holder and Michael Kaszubski
Present:
Frank Cosenza
Absent:
|
Non-Voting Members Present: Ed Anzek, Roger Rousse, Erin Mozer, Katie Talbert and |
|
Mark Witte |
|
Non-Voting Members Absent: Scott Cope |
|
Jack Sage, Ordinance Inspector |
|
Bob White, Supervisor of Ordinance Services |
|
Kim Murphy, Administrative Coordinator |
|
Bud Leafdale, General Superintendent |
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
2005-0293
|
Regular Community Development & Viability Committee Meeting - January 27, |
|
2005. |
012705 Draft Minutes.pdf; Resolution Draft Min.pdf
|
A motion was made by Holder, seconded by Kaszubski, that this matter be |
|
Approved. |
|
Resolved that the Community Development & Viability Committee hereby |
|
approves the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 27, 2005, as presented. |
|
The motion carried by the following vote: |
Aye:
Barnett, Duistermars, Holder and Kaszubski
Absent:
Cosenza
COMMUNICATIONS
|
Mr. Paul Funk, Chairperson of Open Space Preservation Ad-Hoc Committee, provided |
|
an update on Open Space Preservation noting the following: |
|
* Committee is coordinating input from our Save Open Space Rochester Hills Friends |
|
which is a committee that had been formed and is operating in the community for the |
|
last year or two. |
|
* Committee currently have several versions of Open Space Preservation draft ballot |
|
language that is being reviewed. |
|
* Committee is working with Kurt Dawson to develop a millage table showing projected |
|
tax values for the next ten (10) years at various millage rates and what monies would |
|
generate. |
|
* Committee has reviewed as many as 300 parcels in the community and is |
|
coordinating with the Planning Department Master Land Use Plan update. |
|
* Committee is working to recommend non-tax solutions. |
|
* Committee is working on understanding how City Funds are Levied through other |
|
grants, studying best practices around the Country and looking at what other |
|
communities have done and are doing in Michigan and elsewhere. |
|
* An update will be provided at next weeks City Council meeting by Mr. Funk. |
|
* Open Space Preservation Ad-hoc Committee would like Council to review and/or |
|
accept ballot language by mid-June for September ballot. |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
2005-0235
Discussion regarding Purchase of AMR Radio Read System
|
Agenda Summary.pdf; Meter Reading Costs.pdf; Radio Read Bid Tabs. |
|
pdf; Radio Read Return Investment.pdf; Selection of AMR Vendor.pdf; |
|
Meter Reading Options FSC Memo.pdf; Radio Communications re radio |
|
reads.pdf; Meter Reading Brief.pdf; 012605 CC Minutes.pd |
|
Committee discussed purchase of AMR Radio Read System noting that City Council |
|
identified a goal for DPS to minimize future water and sewer rate increases. |
|
Roger Rousse, Director of DPS, presented the following: |
|
* Operations, Finance and Customer Service were areas considered when DPS began |
|
researching different options. |
|
Operations and Operational Difficulties to be corrected by AMR Radio Read: |
|
* Work force has been reduced approximately 25% percent over the past two (2) years. |
|
* Garage employees currently consist of thirty (30) crossed trained employees. |
|
* Work force reduction creates meter reading scheduling problem. |
|
* Meter reading crew consists of seven (7) employees: three (3) installers, three (3) |
|
meter readers and one (1) coordinator. |
|
* Meters must be read within a nine (9) day window for each of the six (6) billing cycles. |
|
* New development increases meters each year by approximately 200. |
|
* Meter reading becomes more and more problematic each year. |
|
* Community is moving from a construction phase to a maintenance phase which |
|
affects meter reading, meter repair and replacement. |
|
* Currently approximately 31,000 meters are in service with 4,200 being very old and |
|
not reading at 100% percent. |
|
* Meter rotation program will consist of replacing these 4,200 outdated meters and |
|
generate an increase of revenue. |
|
* The demand for labor in this area is increasing each year. |
|
* Estimated ten (10) hours per week coordinating the meter crew, two (2) hours per |
|
week on complaints, four (4) hours per week in Accounting. |
|
* Analysis indicates that the number of staff will be reduced by three (3) employees. |
|
* AMR Radio Read would read the entire City in less than eight (8) hours. |
|
Kim Murphy, DPS Coordinator, explained handout/spreadsheet. |
|
Current Meter Reading Costs remaining the same with the following assumptions: |
|
* Annual wages assumes a five (5%) percent annual increase. |
|
* Annual benefits are actual. |
|
* Equipment expense assumes a one (1%) percent annual increase. |
|
* Meter readers assumes 200 new accounts added annually (500 have been added |
|
annually over the last few years). |
|
* 2005 - 2006 assume three (3) meter readers needed. |
|
* 2007 - 2024 assume four (4) meter readers needed. |
|
* Forecasted expenditures for the next 20 years are $9.5 million in meter reading |
|
expense. |
|
Diane Keller, Accountant, predicted four (4) meter readers will be required before 2007. |
|
Kim Murphy, Administrative Coordinator, concluded that the project has a ten (10) to |
|
eleven (11) year payback period . |
|
Bud Leafdale, DPS Superintendent, explained cost effective AMR Radio Read noting |
|
the following: |
|
* Labor costs are increasing. |
|
* Meter reader equipment costs are increasing. |
|
* Reduction in the number of mall meters. |
|
* Inclement weather causes a reduction in actual work days available. |
|
* Accident liabilities due to slip and falls reduces the number of employees available. |
|
* AMR Radio Read requires a lesser number of holes drilled in homes than other |
|
vendors. |
|
* AMR Radio Read does not require homeowner to be home. |
|
* AMR Radio Read can read the current old TTR meters where the other vendors could |
|
not. |
|
Committee members discussed warranty of MXU batteries noting the following: |
|
* Full replacement in the first ten (10) years. |
|
* Pro-rated replacement in the following ten (10) years. |
|
Committee discussed staff reduction savings noting the following: |
|
* When AMR Radio Read System is fully operational, meter reader crew currently |
|
seven (7) will be reduced by three (3) employees. |
|
* AMR Radio Read System can convert to a fixed system at a future date. |
|
Committee members discussed initial cost to residents noting the following: |
|
* Initial cost is $130 to purchase the MXU unit spread out over ten (10) years. |
|
* In conclusion, analysis indicates that the City will save $8.5 million over a 20 year |
|
period using the AMR Radio Read System vs. continuing the way we read them now. |
Discussed
2005-0300
Discussion regarding Conservation Easements
|
Memo to CDV Conservation Easement 106(ver2).pdf; Memo Roger |
|
Conservation Easements.pdf; Info Packet Conservation Easements.pdf; |
|
Oakland Land Conservancy Proposal.pdf |
|
Committee discussed Conservation Easements noting the following: |
|
Roger Rousse, Director of DPS, presented the following: |
|
* Planning Commission has and continues to require developers to put in Conservation |
|
Easements. |
|
* Planning Commission requires developers to mark the Conservation Easements. |
|
* Planning Commission's intent was not to create something for the City to maintain, but |
|
to create a conservation area that residents stay out of and leave it in its natural state. |
|
* Conservation Easements are set-up to maintain native grasses, plants and trees. |
|
* Consequently, there has never been something in place to maintain the Conservation |
|
Easements. |
|
* City found out about the Conservation Easement encroachment last fall where the |
|
developer made a "field adjustment" on installation of a pool. When the resident tried to |
|
sell their home, the survey indicated encroachment. |
|
* Preliminary survey shows there are maybe 100 or more of Conservation Easement |
|
encroachments. |
|
* DPS is looking for direction on how or whether to go ahead and start maintaining |
|
Conservation Easements. |
|
* First step is obtaining an inventory of the encroachments |
|
* Second step is to obtain City Attorney's opinion. |
|
Mr. Barnett requested Mr. Rousse obtain additional information for May Committee |
|
meeting. |
Discussed
NEW BUSINESS
2005-0315
Nominations/Appointments - Ad-Hoc Cemetery Committee Members
|
0315 Agenda Summary.pdf; 041905 Geraci Letter.pdf; Jasinski Candidate |
|
Questionnaire.pdf; Kochanski Candidate Questionniare.pdf; 0315 |
|
Resolution.pdf |
|
Committee discussed Cemetery Ad-hoc Committee nominations and appointments |
|
noting the following: |
|
* Ann Kochanski and Beverly Jasinski submitted Candidate Questionnaires. |
|
* Committee members reviewed, nominated and appointed both applicants. |
|
A motion was made by Holder, seconded by Kaszubski, that this matter be |
|
Approved. |
|
Resolved that the Community Development Committee appoints Beverly Jasinski |
|
and Ann Kochanski to the Ad-Hoc Cemetery Committee to fill the positions |
|
vacated by John Page and Lois Golden. |
|
The motion carried by the following vote: |
Aye:
Barnett, Duistermars, Holder and Kaszubski
Absent:
Cosenza
YOUTH COMMENTS
None Presented
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
2004-0907
Discussion Regarding Sign Ordinance
|
Agenda Summary.pdf; Sign Ordinance (134) (revised 11[1].09.05).pdf; |
|
110205 Agenda Summary.pdf; Ordinance Amendment Chapter 134 Signs |
|
.pdf; Sign Ordinance Table - Revisions 11-2-05.pdf; Sign Ordinance |
|
Comparrison Chart.pdf; 100704 Anzek Ltr Sign Ord.pdf; Ma |
|
Robert White and Jack Sage, Building Department, made a presentation explaining how |
|
staff reviewed, updated and clarified the entire Sign Ordinance Language without |
|
changing the intent of the original ordinance. |
|
Committee was presented with a spreadsheet that reflected the following: |
|
* The reason for the change |
|
It was recommended by the Committee that this item be referred to a Council Workshop |
|
. |
Recommended for Approval to the City Council Work Session
|
Enactment No: RES0378-2005 |
2005-0337
2005 DPS Replacement Equipment - Loader and Flail Mower
DPS Replacement for 121, 35.pdf
|
Committee briefly discussed 2005 DPS Replacement Equipment noting the following: |
|
* Currently City has a front end loader primarily used during winter months and a mower |
|
primarily used in summer months. |
|
* Both vehicles are scheduled for replacement this year. |
|
* DPS would like to combine these two (2) vehicles into a combination vehicle for |
|
greater utilization. |
Discussed
2004-0041
Single Hauler Solid Waste Program Recommendation
|
Agenda Summary.pdf; 0041 Powerpoint.pdf; 200401284 Minutes CC |
|
Work Session.pdf; 20030813 Minutes CC Work Session.pdf; 20030514 |
|
Minutes CC Work Session.pdf; 200300327 Minutes CDV.pdf; Responses |
|
to Flyer-Reject A Single Garbage Hauler 5-14-03.pdf; Frequentl |
|
Committee member Barbara Holder briefly mentioned that a resident requested that the |
|
CDV Committee discuss placing the Single Trash Hauler issue on the ballot. |
Discussed
NEXT MEETING DATE
ADJOURNMENT
|
There being no further business to discuss, Chairperson Barnett adjourned the meeting |
|
at6:50 p.m. |
|
Minutes were prepared by Sue Busam |
|
Minutes were approved as presented at the October 27, 2005 Regular Community |
|
Development & Viability Committee Meeting. |