|
Community Development & Viability |
|
Committee |
Rochester Hills
|
1000 Rochester Hills |
|
Drive |
|
Rochester Hills, MI 48309 |
|
Home Page: www. |
|
rochesterhills.org |
Minutes
|
Ed Anzek, Bryan Barnett, Scott Cope, Frank Cosenza, Barbara Holder, Jim Duistermars, |
|
Michael Kaszubski, Erin Mozer, Roger Rousse, Katie Talbert, Mark Witte |
5:30 PM
1000 Rochester Hills Drive
Thursday, May 26, 2005
CALL TO ORDER
|
Chairperson Barnett called the Community Development & Viability Committee meeting |
|
to order at 5:35 p.m. |
ROLL CALL
|
Bryan Barnett, Jim Duistermars, Barbara Holder, Frank Cosenza and Michael |
|
Kaszubski |
Present:
|
Non-Voting Members Present: Scott Cope, Roger Rousse and Mark Witte |
|
Non-Voting Members Absent: Ed Anzek, Erin Mozer and Katie Talbert |
|
Others Present: Open Space Preservation Ad-Hoc Committee |
|
Committee Member Ed Anzek provided previous notice he would be unable to attend |
|
and asked to be excused. |
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None Presented
COMMUNICATIONS
NEW BUSINESS
2005-0327
|
Report from Open Space Preservation Ad-Hoc Committee - Paul Funk, |
|
Chairperson |
|
Agenda Summary.pdf; Email Funk P 061505.pdf; Agenda Summary |
|
060105.pdf; Agenda Summary 050405.pdf; Memo Galeczka.pdf; Memo |
|
Jenuwine and Millage Revenue.pdf; 0327 Resolution.pdf |
|
Paul Funk, Chairperson of Open Space Preservation Ad-hoc Committee, provided an |
|
update on Open Space Preservation. |
|
* Ad-hoc Committee's goal is to protect and preserve green spaces and habitat, scenic |
|
views, woodlands, wetlands, rivers and streams and expand Clinton River Green Way |
|
and other Trail Corridors. |
|
* Ad-hoc Committee has been working towards promoting a positive campaign within |
|
the community by performing neighborhood walk through, phone calls and side |
|
discussions. |
|
CDV Committee members reviewed the proposed ballot language for Open Space issue |
|
and discussed the following: |
|
* After extensive research of State wide and Nation wide proposals, rules and laws, the |
|
Ad-hoc Committee concluded that there is still greater recognition by the common |
|
citizen with the term "Green Space" as opposed to "Open Space". |
|
* Committee felt in respect to other critical needs in the community that a proposed |
|
millage of .3 would be sufficient and explainable to the community. |
|
* The 0.3 mils constitutes a (40%) forty percent decrease from last years 0.5 mils Open |
|
Space Millage proposal. |
|
* A non-tax solution would be to solicit conservation easements by identifying |
|
properties, talking with the actual land owner, educating and soliciting their support on |
|
providing an easement. |
|
* Committee feels that there is great opportunity for community discussions and |
|
educational forums regarding the Clinton River Green Way and what are some of the |
|
better properties. |
|
* Committee stated that they are not "anti development" and will not bring forward any " |
|
anti development" language. |
|
Committee discussed the Financial aspect of millage and how a 0.3 mil would impact a |
|
household. |
|
In response to the Committee's questions, Mr. Funk acknowledged that he expects John |
|
Staran, City Attorney, to confirm statutory requirements. |
|
Committee recommended that the proposed "Green Space Land Authority" ballot |
|
language move on to City Council. |
|
Mr. Duistermars stated that he did not see this as all residents having a particular |
|
interest in Open Space Preservation. |
|
Ms. Holder disagreed and stated that Open Space Preservation has been an issue with |
|
residents for a long period of time. |
|
A motion was made by Holder, seconded by Kaszubski, that this matter be |
|
Approved and Referred to the City Council Regular Meeting. |
|
RESOLVED: That the Community Development Committee recommends that City |
|
Council consider the placement of the Green Space Land Authority Millage |
|
proposal on the August Primary Election. |
|
The motion carried by the following vote: |
Aye:
Barnett, Holder, Cosenza and Kaszubski
Nay:
Duistermars
|
Enactment No: RES0200-2005 |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
2005-0300
Conservation Easements
|
Standard 11 Conservation Easement Stewardship.pdf; Memo to CDV |
|
Conservation Easement 106(ver2).pdf; Memo Roger Conservation |
|
Easements.pdf; Info Packet Conservation Easements.pdf; Oakland Land |
|
Conservancy Proposal.pdf |
|
Roger Rousse, Director of DPS, presented to the Committee information regarding |
|
Conservation Easement encroachments noting the following: |
|
* City's current Conservation Easement inventory totals forty seven (47). |
|
* Further research is needed to locate and document all Conservation Easements. |
|
* Encroachments range from small buildings, soil replacement, mowed grass, planted |
|
trees, sandboxes to large encroachments such as a swimming pool. |
|
* The question is who responsible for enforcing the Conservation Easements. |
|
Committee discussed the possibility of creating or amending part of the Ordinance to |
|
obtain enforcement authority. |
|
Mr. Funk stated that if the Conservation Easement has been encroached upon and is |
|
deeded to be left alone, then the City is responsible to enforce. |
|
Mr. Rousse explained that Ownership of a Conservation Easement is initially owned by |
|
the Developer. Once the subdivision is established, the ownership of the Conservation |
|
Easement is transferred to the Homeowners Association. |
|
Committee member mentioned Conservation Easements should be recorded on the |
|
Deed. |
|
Member Duistermars suggested that there be a way to designate the property line so |
|
residents know where their property ends. |
|
Mr. Rousse indicated he would need staff and equipment to do boundary surveys to |
|
identify these locations. |
|
Consensus of Committee is to have the Administration continue to research this issue |
|
and place it on a future meeting agenda. |
Discussed
2005-0337
2005 DPS Replacement Equipment - Loader and Flail Mower
DPS Replacement for 121, 35.pdf
|
Roger Rousse, Director of DPS, provided the proposed 2005 DPS Replacement |
|
Equipment as follows: |
|
Committee members discussed the Proposal of purchasing one (1) multi-purpose |
|
vehicle vs. purchasing two (2) individual purpose vehicles. |
|
* Combining these vehicles into one (1) saves approximately $33,000. |
|
* Combination vehicle will be utilized to a greater extent annually. |
|
Consensus of Committee members to approve this purchase. |
|
A motion was made by Duistermars, seconded by Kaszubski, that this matter be |
|
Approved and Referred to the City Council Regular Meeting. |
|
The motion carried by the following vote: |
Aye:
Barnett, Duistermars, Holder, Cosenza and Kaszubski
YOUTH COMMENTS
None Presented
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
None Presented
NEXT MEETING DATE
June 23, 2005
ADJOURNMENT
|
There being no further business to discuss, Chairperson Barnett adjourned the meeting |
|
at 6:26 p.m. |
|
Minutes prepared by Sue Busam |
|
Anyone planning to attend the meeting who has need of special assistance under the |
|
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is asked to contact the Clerk's Office at 248-841-2460 at |
|
least 48 hours prior to the meeting. |
|
Approved as presented at the February 23, 2006 Community Development & Viability |
|
Committee Meeting. |