Crystal Report Viewer

1000 ‎Rochester Hills Dr‎. ‎

Rochester Hills, MI ‎

48309‎

(‎248‎) ‎656‎-‎4600‎

Home Page‎: ‎

www‎.‎rochesterhills‎.‎org‎

Rochester Hills

Minutes

Planning Commission

7:00 PM

1000 Rochester Hills Drive

Tuesday, March 16, 1999

CALL TO ORDER

Chairperson Eric Kaiser called the Regular Meeting to order at ‎7‎:‎30 ‎p‎.‎m‎. ‎in ‎

the Auditorium‎.‎

ROLL CALL

Present PC‎: ‎Chairperson Eric Kaiser‎

William Boswell‎

Paul Corneliussen‎

John Gaber‎

Paul Krupa‎

Christian Ramanauskas‎

James Rosen‎

Audrey Ruggiero‎

Absent PC‎: ‎Eugene Nowicki‎

Quorum present‎

Also present‎: ‎Patricia Goodwin, Director of Planning‎

Susanne Vergeldt, Recording Secretary‎

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

2000-1939

December ‎15‎, ‎1998 ‎Regular Meeting‎

Regular Meeting of December ‎15‎, ‎1998‎

MOTION‎ by Corneliussen, seconded by Ruggiero, that the Minutes dated ‎

December ‎15‎, ‎1998 ‎be accepted as printed‎.‎

Ayes‎:‎ All‎

Nays‎:‎ None ‎MOTION CARRIED‎.‎

Approved

COMMUNICATIONS

A‎.‎ Chairperson Eric Kaiser gave a moving tribute to the memory of Planning ‎

Commissioner Eugene Nowicki who passed away on March ‎3‎, ‎1999‎.‎

B‎.‎ Two‎-‎page packet from Melinda Denninger regarding Agenda Item IV‎.‎A‎. ‎

Powerhouse Center, will be added to the file‎

C‎.‎ Term expirations will be taken up next week‎

D‎.‎ Updated Planning Commission roster ‎

E‎.‎ Flyer regarding Friends of Richmond to Pontiac Trail, inaugural first ‎

meeting on March ‎16‎, ‎1999‎

F‎.‎ Public Information Meeting Notice March ‎23‎, ‎1999‎ regarding paving of ‎

Dequindre, Mt‎. ‎Vernon and ‎26‎ Mile Roads‎

G‎.‎ Ordinance Amendment No‎. ‎200-801‎

H‎.‎ Oakland Planning Newsletter, Winter ‎1999‎

I‎.‎ Planning & Zoning News, February ‎1999‎

J‎.‎ Letter from the applicant dated March ‎10‎, ‎1999‎ regarding File No‎. ‎98-‎

012‎. ‎Changes have been proposed to the site plan; therefore the ‎

Chair will hear from the applicant and the public who feel a need to ‎

comment on the changes‎. ‎The changes will generate discussion, but ‎

there will be no retread of ground already covered‎.‎

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

2000-1909

Request for a Tree Removal Permit ‎- ‎File No‎. ‎98‎-‎012 ‎- ‎Powerhouse Center, a ‎

26‎,‎375 ‎square‎-‎foot retail center comprising a gymnasium, retail sales area and ‎

restaurant on ‎5‎.‎825 ‎acres, located on the south side of Auburn, east of ‎

Rochester Road, Parcel No‎. ‎15‎-‎35‎-‎100‎-‎043‎, zoned B‎-‎3‎, Shopping Center ‎

Business, Minoru Yamasaki, Inc‎.‎, ‎6841 ‎North Rochester, Suite ‎300‎, Rochester ‎

Hills, MI ‎48306‎, Applicant‎.‎

(‎This item is placed on the agenda for either a reconsideration of ‎

the failed motion to deny Site Plan Approval and‎/‎or a new ‎

motion to either deny or approve the Site Plan‎. ‎The Planning ‎

Commission will allow no further public comment or applicant ‎

presentation at this meeting‎. ‎The item is for action by the ‎

Planning Commission only‎.) ‎

(‎Reference‎: ‎Staff Memo prepared by Patricia Goodwin dated March ‎9‎, ‎1999 ‎has ‎

been placed on file and by reference becomes part of the record hereof‎.) ‎

The Chair announced that a new site plan has been submitted by the applicant within ‎

the last few days and staff has not had sufficient time to review those changes‎. ‎He ‎

would expect the changes to generate discussion‎. ‎Therefore, the Chair will hear from ‎

the applicant and the public who feel a need to comment on the changes, but there will ‎

be no retread of ground already covered‎. ‎No copies of the latest revision were ‎

available for distribution to the Planning Commission‎.‎

The Chair reviewed that the previous meeting on March ‎2‎, ‎1999 ‎ended in a tie vote to ‎

deny site plan approval‎. ‎The absence of three Planning Commission members ‎

allowed for the tie‎. ‎A motion can now be made by one of the makers of the motion to ‎

reconsider the failed motion, a motion to reconsider can also be made by one of the ‎

absent members, or a new motion can be made to approve the site plan, or discussion ‎

could ensue and possibly result in a new motion‎. ‎

Present were Mr‎. ‎Philip Vestevich and Robert Szantner of Minoru Yamasaki ‎

architectural firm‎.‎

The Chair noted that Member Gaber requested the Planning staff to research whether ‎

some parking and floor space computations were not necessarily made according to ‎

the appropriate formula‎. ‎The Chair thought that was arguable and preferred to focus ‎

on the changes to the site plan that the applicant would like the Planning Commission ‎

to consider‎. ‎

Mr‎. ‎Vestevich explained that the building will be moved ‎5 ‎feet to the west to provide a ‎

total setback of ‎87 ‎feet on the easterly side of the proposed building; the ordinance ‎

requires ‎75 ‎feet minimum‎. ‎The previous site plan showed a setback of ‎82 ‎feet‎. ‎In ‎

addition the parking spaces have been reduced from ‎211 ‎to ‎176‎. ‎That change comes ‎

from a recalculation after removing the free standing restaurant which had been ‎

incorporated into the multi‎-‎use building, and also the ‎80‎/‎20 ‎usable floor space ‎

formula‎. ‎They had been operating on a ‎100 ‎percent premise‎. ‎As before, there ‎

would be no parking spaces along the easterly side of the proposed building‎. ‎The ‎

parking spaces eliminated are from the second row of parking spaces on the westerly ‎

part of the building closest to the building‎. ‎This results in a wider drive area and ‎

service zone on the east side of the building‎. ‎They have also added a small landscape ‎

area on the west side of the building‎. ‎The size of the building would be ‎33‎,‎000 ‎square ‎

feet‎. ‎That is picked up by an increment along the westerly dimension of the building ‎-- ‎

the building becomes wider to the west, and a portion on the northerly side toward ‎

Auburn Road‎. ‎The prior square footage was ‎26‎,‎375 ‎square feet‎. ‎The depth of the ‎

building varies from ‎80 ‎feet to ‎120 ‎feet plus the canopy depth of ‎10 ‎feet‎. ‎The ‎

increase in the depth through the mid‎-‎section by ‎20 ‎feet‎. ‎The thickness of the back of ‎

the building is the same‎. ‎The width of the building has been increased from ‎80 ‎feet ‎

and ‎60 ‎feet in previous submitals to ‎80 ‎feet and ‎100 ‎feet‎. ‎

The applicant indicated that the actual structure has not moved any closer to Auburn ‎

Road‎. ‎Ms‎. ‎Goodwin pointed out that the setback is taken off the canopy, and the ‎

canopy is considered part of the structure so it has moved closer to Auburn Road‎.‎

Mr‎. ‎Szantner explained how those dimensions are predicated on the change in the ‎

number of parking spaces and what it does to the amount of use the proposed site will ‎

get‎. ‎The previous parking counts were predicated on a restaurant use as a major ‎

anchor, which had a certain seat ratio and use pattern‎. ‎Retail does not have as dense ‎

a use pattern as a full service restaurant‎. ‎The actual use pattern is being reduced, so ‎

the number of cars and the amount of traffic would be reduced‎. ‎

Mr‎. ‎Vestevich added that the gym would be in operation from ‎6‎:‎00 ‎a‎.‎m‎. ‎to ‎10‎:‎00 ‎

p‎.‎m‎. -- ‎not ‎24 ‎hours a day‎. ‎Their other operations close at ‎10‎:‎00 ‎p‎.‎m‎. ‎The other ‎

retail users would probably close around ‎9‎:‎00 ‎p‎.‎m‎. ‎They have no restaurant tenant at ‎

present and no liquor applicant‎. ‎If that happens in the future, that would be a whole ‎

different tract‎. ‎There is an additional landscaping area in the middle of the building on ‎

the westerly side‎. ‎There is a drive‎-‎in bank feature at the north end, which they have ‎

drawn in on the plan‎. ‎There is five more feet of pavement, and the buffer is the same‎. ‎

It did not result in more green area because of the way the trash and service areas ‎

along the fire lane were revised‎. ‎Now the building is straight across the back, and the ‎

compactor is adjacent to the building which now has a straight configuration instead of ‎

a recessed area‎. ‎It could be recessed at the northerly end‎. ‎

Member Gaber pointed out with the increase in the building size, the required number ‎

of parking spaces will increase‎. ‎Ms‎. ‎Goodwin explained that this was the first she had ‎

heard of the ‎33‎,‎000 ‎square feet‎. ‎Her memo dated March ‎9‎, ‎1999 ‎was based on the ‎

previous plan with ‎26‎,‎375 ‎square feet which has been presented to the commission on ‎

two previous occasions‎. ‎The ordinance requires that minimum parking for shopping ‎

centers be calculated at ‎150 ‎square feet for the usable floor area‎. ‎Where the tenants ‎

are not known staff uses ‎80 ‎percent of the total gross area as the basis for calculating ‎

the number of required parking spaces at one space for every ‎150 ‎square feet of ‎

usable floor area‎. ‎In the previous plan of ‎26‎,‎375 ‎square feet the tenants were known‎. ‎

The purpose of her memo was to respond to the question raised by Member Gaber ‎

regarding how the parking was calculated given a recent ordinance amendment which ‎

proposes to change the label of usable floor area to sales area‎. ‎

Since site plans were not available for Planning Commissioners' review, Mr‎. ‎Szantner ‎

drew the approximate building shape on the chalkboard and pointed out the new ‎

location of the trash compactor in the northeast corner‎. ‎Moving it to the north gets it ‎

farther away from the homes in the adjacent Wildflower Subdivision‎. ‎

Member Boswell had difficulty voting on a site plan that he has not seen‎. ‎He could ‎

vote on the previous site plan discussed on two previous occasions‎. ‎The Chair ‎

understood and probably would agree‎.‎

Member Corneliussen clarified with the applicant that the fire lane would be increased ‎

in width from ‎23 ‎feet to ‎28 ‎feet but it still depends on what is acceptable for the trash ‎

compactor area‎. ‎Member Corneliussen echoed Member Boswell's comments‎.‎

The Chair accepted comments from the public‎.‎

Joe Peplinski, ‎3359 ‎Primrose Dr‎.‎, ‎was concerned about the location of a ‎

turnaround area for the drive‎-‎through bank, and if it would have a ‎24 ‎hour teller‎. ‎It ‎

would appear that there would be more traffic along the east property line next to the ‎

residential area‎.‎

Debra Blackford, ‎517 ‎Buttercup, ‎understood people's concerns about the ‎

view from their homes as she runs through the subdivision, and they have good reason ‎

to be concerned‎. ‎

Robert Lahiff,‎ attorney for some of the residents of Wildflower Subdivision, ‎

thought he had made reasonable arguments several months ago regarding the ‎26‎,‎000 ‎

square foot building‎. ‎It would appear that those same arguments still apply and even ‎

emphasized regarding a larger building‎. ‎He clarified that he does not live in the ‎

Wildflower Subdivision; the residents are paying him to be here for each meeting‎. ‎A ‎

precedent may be set with the greater square footage proposed this evening‎. ‎The plan ‎

proposed tonight is fundamentally at odds with everything in the zoning ordinance‎.‎

Melinda Denninger, ‎3136 ‎Primrose, ‎stated that the hours of operation are ‎

not equal to restrictions and they could change‎.‎

There were no more comments from the public‎.‎

The Chair compared the applicant's revisions to the last two paragraphs of Ms‎. ‎

Goodwin's memo dated March ‎9‎, ‎1999 ‎which recommended Alternative B‎. ‎"‎In this ‎

case it appears that the tradeoff for the excess spaces is the lack of additional ‎

open space and buffers from the development to the adjacent homes on the east‎. ‎

If the building were to be moved ‎25 ‎feet farther to the west as depicted in the ‎

Alternative B, then the parking on the east side and the row at the Auburn Rd ‎

frontage on the north side ‎(‎approx‎. ‎52 ‎spaces‎) ‎could be eliminated‎. ‎This would ‎

still allow for at least ‎18 ‎additional spaces over the required minimum of ‎140 ‎

while leaving ‎100 ‎feet of separation between the property line and the closest ‎

point of the building‎. ‎A modification in the parking count and layout could ‎

make Alternative B a reasonable compromise to address the concerns of the ‎

residents and the viability of the project‎."‎ ‎

The Chair commented that the sense of Ms‎. ‎Goodwin's memo is very different from ‎

the submitted revised plan‎. ‎This was an opportunity to find some middle ground, and ‎

instead the Planning Commission is confronted with a much larger building‎. ‎The ‎

Chair's gut feeling was that there could be a change in the way the proposed building ‎

would be used over time‎. ‎The Chair did not buy the concept that less parking would ‎

mean less cars‎. ‎If there were going to be less cars on the subject site, the applicant's ‎

business projections would be inaccurate‎. ‎Just wanting the commission to approve a ‎

larger building is not consistent with the messages sent previously regarding this ‎

project‎.‎

Ms‎. ‎Goodwin reiterated that the plans being discussed this evening have not been ‎

submitted to staff for review, and this is the first that she has heard of a ‎33‎,‎000 ‎square ‎

foot building‎. ‎

Member Rosen read Mr‎. ‎Vestevich's comments in the March ‎2‎, ‎1999 ‎meeting draft ‎

minutes that state that his group has not considered and do not expect to consider a ‎

future expansion, and that the site is maxed out; expanding would not result in a ‎

functional or attractive outcome; the building could not be expanded based on the ‎

parking configurations‎. ‎The parking configurations have now been changed with the ‎

site plan submitted this evening‎. ‎Mr‎. ‎Vestevich responded that the reason Ms‎. ‎

Goodwin just heard about the ‎33‎,‎000 ‎square foot building today is because he just ‎

heard yesterday that the restaurant formula is not applied in a strip center; they were ‎

operating under the ‎100 ‎percent floor space formula instead of ‎80‎/‎20 ‎as generally ‎

applied‎. ‎The increase in building size will not be visible to the adjacent homeowners ‎

as it will all be to the west, and it has no impact on residents at all‎. ‎There will be no ‎

parking to the east adjacent to the homeowners‎.‎

Mr‎. ‎Vestevich reviewed that the proposed change in building size is not a dramatic ‎

increase in terms of the impact on homeowners; it's all to the west; there are no ‎

additional doors, cars or trucks or dumpsters in the back; the fully screened and gated ‎

dumpster areas have been reduced from two to one and moved to the north to be ‎

farther away from most of the homes; a bank is a low intensity user as compared to an ‎

end‎-‎cap restaurant with limited hours and limited garbage problems and employees; ‎

he would think the Planning Commission would welcome that‎. ‎the ‎24‎-‎hour ATM ‎

machine does not create noise or traffic‎. ‎It appeared to Member Rosen that the ‎

applicant has made the building as big as possible and made the impact even worse so ‎

that he has greater opportunity to do more later‎. ‎It appeared to Member Rosen that ‎

he has been mislead because the applicant did not submit the plans to city staff before ‎

asking the Planning Commission to vote on them‎. ‎He would call that bait‎-‎and‎-‎switch, ‎

or slip‎-‎it‎-‎in‎-‎under‎-‎the‎-‎door‎. ‎It made him angry and he didn't like it‎. ‎

Member Gaber was not sure that what is proposed is the right balance‎.‎

Member Boswell agreed with Member Rosen‎. ‎

Mr‎. ‎Vestevich wanted to balance all the competing interests, and one of them is ‎

making a proper use of the property‎. ‎The increased square footage does not impact ‎

the homeowners at all‎. ‎

Mr‎. ‎Vestevich requested to ‎withdraw the site plan carried over from the last ‎

meeting on March ‎2‎, ‎1999‎,‎ and asked to be placed on the next agenda‎. ‎He will ‎

submit new plans within the next two to three days to the city‎. ‎Mr‎. ‎Szantner did not ‎

anticipate any changes in the tree permit request‎. ‎Trees will be rearranged on the ‎

buffer strip‎.‎

Ms‎. ‎Goodwin indicated that it will be approximately six weeks before this item can be ‎

scheduled again‎. ‎In light of the withdrawal of the previous site plan, the previous tie ‎

vote is moot‎. ‎The next plan that is submitted will be a new site plan rather than a ‎

modification‎. ‎All departments will have to review it, and will have to review queuing ‎

lanes for the proposed bank as well as other features‎.‎

Mr‎. ‎Vestevich had hoped for a vote with the modifications described tonight for a ‎

33‎,‎000 ‎square foot building, with an ‎87 ‎foot setback, and ‎176 ‎parking spaces with all ‎

increases away from the adjacent homeowners‎. ‎He had hoped that would be a ‎

conceptual enough content for a vote without a drawing‎. ‎The applicant could supply a ‎

drawing in one or two days incorporating these changes if it was felt to be essential‎. ‎

Commissioners provided their views on the proposed changes presented tonight to aid ‎

the applicant in his preparation of a new site plan‎. ‎The Chair would vote no, based on ‎

the discovery of more room after being told that the site was maxed out and the ‎

building would provide an adequate return on investment; the five additional feet is ‎

meaningless for a development of this type‎. ‎Members Corneliussen and Ruggiero had ‎

two prime concerns, namely respect for the initial site plan condition for Meijer's, and ‎

parking, and preferred Option B‎. ‎Member Ramanauskas would need a drawing to ‎

make a decision, the height of the building could increase because of the increase in ‎

size; the applicant has created his own problem‎. ‎Member Krupa echoed previous ‎

comments plus traffic flow for an ATM teller, size of the buffer‎.‎

Member Boswell agreed with previous comments made by commissioners; Option B ‎

was his preference‎. ‎Member Rosen agreed with what has been said, and still ‎

unresolved is the drainage and traffic ingress and egress; preserving the berm is ‎

important; he favored Option B‎. ‎Member Gaber had hoped to see a substantial ‎

increase in the greenbelt and obviously no parking on the east side of the building; he ‎

could accept the bank and drive‎-‎thru on the north side of the property; can accept ‎

moving the building farther to the west and even a slight expansion to the west side of ‎

the building‎.‎

Mr‎. ‎Vestevich stated that he will be in communication with the Planning Department, ‎

and he just wants fair and equal treatment‎.‎

(‎Reference‎: ‎Staff Memo prepared by Patricia A‎. ‎Goodwin dated March ‎9‎, ‎1999‎; ‎

Letter dated March ‎10‎, ‎1999 ‎from Philip Vestevich; Two‎-‎page packet from Melinda ‎

Denninger‎.)‎

Postponed

2000-1910

Request for Site Plan Approval ‎- ‎File No‎. ‎98‎-‎012 ‎- ‎Powerhouse Center‎

Postponed

NEW BUSINESS

2000-1940

Request for Rezoning Recommendation ‎(‎Public Hearing‎) - ‎File No‎. ‎99‎-‎002 ‎- ‎An ‎

amendment to Zoning Ordinance ‎200 ‎to rezone two parcels of land totaling ‎1‎.‎06 ‎

acres from R‎-‎4‎, One Family Residential to O‎-‎1‎, Office Business, located at ‎110 ‎

South Boulevard, north of South Boulevard west of Rochester Rd‎.‎, Parcel Nos‎. ‎

15‎-‎34‎-‎477‎-‎010 ‎and ‎-‎011‎, Freeman Greer, GAV Associates, Inc‎.‎, ‎30400 ‎

Telegraph Rd‎.‎, Suite ‎405‎, Bingham Farms, MI ‎48025‎, Applicant‎

(‎Reference‎: ‎Staff Report prepared by Robert Kagler of McKenna Associates dated ‎

February ‎11‎, ‎1999 ‎has been placed on file and by reference becomes part of the ‎

record hereof‎.)‎

Present was Gary Piontkowski, the property owner‎.‎

Ms‎. ‎Goodwin stated that the proposed rezoning does conform to the Master Land ‎

Use Plan‎. ‎Commissioners may recall that the corner nine acres were replanned from ‎

commercial shopping center business to office, and a major office development has ‎

been constructed on the corner‎. ‎The subject two parcels lie immediately to the west ‎

of that corner parcel‎. ‎The proposed rezoning represents basically a squaring off of the ‎

land use in the area‎. ‎There is a Detroit Edison compound abutting the subject parcels ‎

to the west‎. ‎There is an existing house abutting the Detroit Edison compound which is ‎

situated right on the property line and will not be impacted by the proposed rezoning ‎

at all‎.‎

Mr‎. ‎Piontkowski explained that the request is pretty cut‎-‎and‎-‎dried; drainage and ‎

sewers are present‎. ‎The request would just be cleaning up the intersection and would ‎

eliminate the house which is not desirable for a family because of its setback from the ‎

road and its condition‎. ‎

The Chair ‎opened the public hearing‎. ‎No persons came forward to speak ‎

regarding the proposed rezoning‎. ‎The Chair ‎closed the public hearing‎.‎

Member Krupa confirmed with Ms‎. ‎Goodwin that residents on Orchardview within ‎

300 ‎feet of the subject parcel were notified of the rezoning request‎.‎

Mr‎. ‎Piontkowski could think of no reason not to rezone the subject parcels, as the ‎

existing house is not desirable and requires cleaning up; if the existing house were ‎

removed and the residential zoning remained, another house would be built on the site‎.‎

MOTION‎ by Boswell, seconded by Krupa, in the matter of File No‎. ‎99‎-‎002 ‎(‎110 ‎

South Boulevard‎)‎, that the Planning Commission ‎recommend approval‎ of the ‎

request to rezone two parcels of land totaling ‎1‎.‎06 ‎acres ‎from‎ R‎-‎4‎, One Family ‎

Residential ‎to‎ O‎-‎1‎, Office Business, identified as Parcel Nos‎. ‎15‎-‎34‎-‎477‎-‎010 ‎and ‎

-‎011‎, located at ‎110 ‎South Boulevard, on the north side of South Boulevard between ‎

Rochester Road and Orchardview‎.‎

Ayes‎:‎ All‎

Nays‎:‎ None ‎MOTION CARRIED‎.‎

(‎Ref‎: ‎Staff Reports prepared by McKenna Associates dated February ‎11‎, ‎1999 ‎and ‎

February ‎10‎, ‎1999‎; Letter of authorization from GAV Associates dated January ‎11‎, ‎

1999‎; Environmental Impact Statement; Letter of Intent; Statement Why Change is ‎

Requested; Purchase Agreement; Land Addendum; Notice of Public Hearing; ‎

Application to Rezone‎.)‎

Recommended for Approval to the City Council Regular Meeting

ANY OTHER BUSINESS

A‎.‎ Ms‎. ‎Goodwin informed the Planning Commission that Marriott ‎

International intends to come back to the Planning Commission with a ‎

request for a PUD‎. ‎Ms‎. ‎Goodwin reviewed Marriott's previous ‎

appearance before the Planning Commission on January ‎19‎, ‎1999‎ ‎

with a request to rezone to SP, Special Purpose‎. ‎City Council has ‎

indicated a desire to be involved in the PUD concept from the ‎

beginning as this will be the first project under the recently approved ‎

PUD ordinance‎. ‎A joint meeting between the Planning Commission ‎

and City Council will probably be required‎.‎

B‎.‎ Member Krupa announced that this would be his last meeting on the ‎

Planning Commission as he will not be reappointed‎. ‎

C‎.‎ Member Boswell stated that Gene Nowicki was an American hero to him, ‎

and he will miss Gene very much‎. ‎The Chair announced that he will ‎

recommend that a statement be included in the Master Land Use Plan ‎

Update regarding the contributions made by the late Eugene Nowicki‎. ‎

Suggestions were made regarding possible memorials, such as the ‎

Nowicki Auditorium, or the Nowicki Archives to recognize the ‎

volumes of historical data that he had collected and the font of ‎

historical information he provided‎. ‎Member Gaber will pass these ‎

suggestions on to City Council‎. ‎

NEXT MEETING DATE

Chairperson Kaiser reminded Commissioners that the next two meetings are ‎

SPECIAL Study Meetings scheduled for March ‎23‎, ‎1999 ‎and March ‎30‎, ‎1999‎.‎

‎

The next Regular Meeting is scheduled for April ‎6‎, ‎1999‎.‎

ADJOURNMENT

Hearing no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairperson ‎

Kaiser adjourned the regular meeting at ‎9‎:‎28 ‎p‎.‎m‎. ‎Michigan time‎.‎