Community Development & Viability |
Committee |
Rochester Hills
1000 Rochester Hills |
Drive |
Rochester Hills, MI 48309 |
Home Page: www. |
rochesterhills.org |
Minutes
Ed Anzek, Bryan Barnett, Scott Cope, Frank Cosenza, Jim Duistermars, Barbara Holder, |
Kristina Hurst, Michael Kaszubski, Elise Pawlowski, Roger Rousse |
5:30 PM
1000 Rochester Hills Drive
Thursday, November 17, 2005
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Barnett called the CDV Committee meeting to order at 5:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Bryan Barnett, Jim Duistermars, Frank Cosenza and Michael Kaszubski
Present:
Barbara Holder
Absent:
Non-Voting Members Present: Ed Anzek, Scott Cope, Roger Rousse, Kristina Hurst and |
Elise Pawlowski |
Non-Voting Members Absent: |
Committee Member Barb Holder provided previous notice she would be unable to attend |
and asked to be excused. |
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None Presented
COMMUNICATIONS
December CDV Special Meeting Notice Date Change |
Revised Proposed Street Lighting Policy |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
2004-0163
Proposed Street Lighting Policy
021606 Draft Street Lighting Policy.pdf; Street Lighting Policy.pdf; 2nd |
Revision Street Lighting Policy.pdf; Street Lighting Policy FS 101305.pdf |
Roger Rousse, DPS Director, presented the Proposed Street Lighting Policy Changes |
noting the following: |
* Original proposed policy recommended approval of street lighting requests by City |
Council. |
Ms. Hill requested she would like the proposed policy to state that approval would come |
from the Advisory Traffic Safety Board and Engineering and not City Council. She |
further requested she would also like included in the Street Lighting Policy instructions |
for SAD process clarified with a procedure and a time table for implementing an SAD for |
Mr. Rousse reiterated that the City does not have a Street Lighting Policy and that a |
number of street lighting requests have come forward. He further stated that when a |
request comes in, there is a guideline but there is no formal policy. When considering |
these requests, the City looks at adjoining lighting, the need for lighting, school locations |
and if its a common benefit to all the City; the request is evaluated and considered for |
City funding. |
Mr. Edward Anzek, Director of Planning Commission, stated that typically many |
communities fund their lighting through Public Safety Fund or Police Fund and are |
considered more of a crime prevention safety issue. He further stated that any lighting |
to improve school safety should be paid for by the schools. |
Discussed
2005-0300
Conservation Easements
Standard 11 Conservation Easement Stewardship.pdf; Memo to CDV |
Conservation Easement 106(ver2).pdf; Memo Roger Conservation |
Easements.pdf; Info Packet Conservation Easements.pdf; Oakland Land |
Conservancy Proposal.pdf |
Roger Rousse, DPS Director, discussed Conservation Easements encroachments |
noting the following: |
* Handout shows a detailed cost estimate for Committee review. |
* Oakland Land Conservancy gave a presentation to the City. |
* City is questioning who enforces encroachments and are they worth maintaining. |
* First step is to do a City Wide inventory of Conservation Easements. |
Mr. Rousse suggested initial funding would come through the Facilities Department |
Land Management Division and if the City decides to defend Conservation Easements, |
the funding would come from the Building Department Ordinance Enforcement. |
* It was suggested to notify residents in writing. |
* City runs the risk of losing Conservation Easements and/or can incur the risk of |
liability. |
* Encroachments are not just Conservation Easements, its City owned park land, such |
as, one resident in Riverbend Park who placed an irrigation system on City owned land. |
* Encroachments range from more permanent structures such as sheds, pools and |
swing sets to simply mowing and planting. |
* It was suggested that the City do a phase in approach by subdivisions. |
* It was suggested to prioritize Conservation Easements based on the level of |
importance, such as, steep slope setbacks protecting rivers vs. vegetative buffers. |
* Committee member mentioned that when a property is on the market for sale, that the |
City has an opportunity to go in and see if there is an encroachment. |
Chairperson Barnett suggested formulating a City Council Policy that states the City's |
goal is to bring all of these Conservation Easements back into compliance. |
Ed Anzek, Planning Commission Director, suggested placing a notice of new policy on |
channel 55/10 and in the Hills Herald. |
Discussed
2005-0608
Discussion regarding Road Millage
Supplemental Information.pdf
Ed Anzek, Planning Commission Director, discussed the Local Road Millage noting the |
following: |
Mr. Anzek requested the Youth Council Representatives to ask their parents if they were |
in support or against the road millage; which would help the City to better understand |
what the residents are thinking and to perhaps help the City to communicate the need of |
a road millage to the residents. |
* The City has worked with a citizens group since January 2005 to develop solutions for |
local road funding which includes construction, winter maintenance (snow plowing), |
administration, traffic services. |
* Citizens group looked at different scenarios, such as, how we fix roads, maintain |
roads, types of materials used, cost of materials etc. |
* It was the consensus of the Citizens group to ask residents to approve a graduated |
millage. |
Mr. Anzek discussed the percentage difference between the failed millage of 2004 vs. |
the failed millage of 2005 noting the following: |
* Data shows that the City improved their position by 1.39% percent with more |
residents being in favor of the road millage. |
* Data shows that several precincts surprisingly went from favoring a local road millage |
to not favoring the millage. |
* City contracted a PR firm at $13,500 to help educate the public with newspaper |
articles, flyers, mail outs, press kits etc. |
* Total education budget was $50,000, City spent $26,000 on educating the public with |
he local road millage proposal. |
* The "No New Tax" group attacked the City aggressively for wasting monies on this PR |
Firm Program. |
Mr. Anzek stated received feedback from the Hills Herald article was very effective and |
well done. |
* PR firm recommended a phone survey because phone surveys get to the underlying |
cause and root of why there is such a strong element against the City government and |
the use of dedicated monies. |
* Road Committee Citizens group has decided to disband but stated that they will be in |
attendance at City Council meetings until they hear what the New City Council members |
plans are. |
* Road Committee Citizens group has a better understanding and good feeling on what |
City Council has done in the past, what the Administration has done and what the Staff |
has done. |
Mr. Anzek mentioned another strategy which came from Rapids City Iowa which had six |
(6) failed millages, the strategy included placing on the ballot 1) a maintenance |
reconstruction program 2) an SAD program which would cause the residents to |
research a SAD program possibly resulting in the passage of the millage. |
Discussed
YOUTH COMMENTS
Chairperson Barnett asked Youth Council to introduce themselves. |
Kristina Hurst stated she is a sophomore at Adams High School. |
Elise Pawlowski stated she is a senior at Adams High School and participates in the |
marching band as drum major and also plays french horn and flute. |
Committee member Jim Duistermars inquired if any of their friends had made comments |
on what they want to see happen in the City. |
Youths responded that most friends are not aware of what goes on in the City. |
Committee members directed Youths to keep their friends informed on what is going on |
in the City. |
Chairperson Barnett thanked the Youths and welcomed them to the CDV Committee. |
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Snow Policy
Roger Rousse, DPS Director, discussed Snow Policy noting the following: |
* Rochester Hills Snow Policy is identically modeled after the Road Commission Policy. |
* The level of service provided is comparable to what residents in adjoining |
communities are receiving. |
* 2005 snow plowing local roads has cost $260,000 to date. |
* 2005 remaining budget at $280,000. |
* Pathways will not be plowed until all the local roads are plowed. |
Discussed
NEXT MEETING DATE
Next meeting date is Thursday, December 15, 2006 at 5:30 p.m. Michigan Time.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, Chairperson Barnett adjourned the meeting |
at 6:40 p.m. |
Minutes prepared by Sue Busam |
Minutes were approved as presented at the June 22, 2006 Regular Community |
Development & Viability Committee Meeting. |