Community Development & Viability |
Committee |
Rochester Hills
1000 Rochester Hills |
Drive |
Rochester Hills, MI 48309 |
Home Page: www. |
rochesterhills.org |
Minutes
Ed Anzek, Bryan Barnett, Scott Cope, Frank Cosenza, Barbara Holder, Jim Duistermars |
Sahar Emambakhsh, Michael Kaszubski, Roger Rousse, Ann Ruggiero, Kathryn Tignanelli |
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Barnett called the meeting to order at 5:35 PM.
ROLL CALL
Bryan Barnett, Barbara Holder and Michael Kaszubski
Present:
Jim Duistermars and Frank Cosenza
Absent:
Non-Voting Members Present: Ed Anzek, Scott Cope, Roger Rousse and |
Non-Voting Members Absent: Sahar Emambakhsh, Ann Ruggiero |
Committee Members Emambakhsh and Ruggiero provided previous notice they would |
be unable to attend and asked to be excused. |
Others Present: Mayor Pat Somerville, Mark Nottley and Dalene Sprick, Rehmann |
Robson |
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
2004-0168
Regular Meeting - November 13, 2003
Draft minutes.pdf
Minutes were approved as presented at the April 22, 2004 Community Development & |
Viability Committee Meeting and were placed on this agenda in error. |
Closed
2004-0308
Regular Meeting - December 11, 2003
Draft Minutes.pdf
Minutes were approved as presented at the April 22, 2004 Community Development & |
Viability Committee Meeting and were placed on this agenda in error. |
Closed
2004-0169
Regular Meeting - January 22, 2004
012204 CDV DRAFT Minutes.pdf
Minutes were approved as presented at the April 22, 2004 Community Development & |
Viability Committee Meeting and were placed on this agenda in error. |
Closed
COMMUNICATIONS
None were presented.
Mr. Duistermars entered at 5:45 PM. |
Bryan Barnett, Barbara Holder, Jim Duistermars and Michael Kaszubski
Present:
Frank Cosenza
Absent:
NEW BUSINESS
2004-0469
Local Road Millage Initiative
081804 Agenda Summary.pdf; Local Street Millage Ballot Language.pdf; |
071404 Agenda Summary.pdf; RR Public Education Inititiative Outline & |
sample timeline 052704.pdf; 3.2 Mils - 10 yr w/o MRF transfer.pdf; 3.08 |
Mils - 10 yr w/o MRF transfer.pdf; Residenti |
The consensus from the previous joint Community Development and Viability & |
Financial Services Meeting held May 20, 2004 was to move forward with a millage |
request. |
Mr. Mark Nottley, from Rehmann Robson, distributed an outline for the final report ( |
attached to the legislative file) that pertains to the draft final report that will be forth |
coming on June 7, 2004. The report will include the following: |
* "Real road funding" that includes anticipated funding shortfalls with operations and |
construction. |
* A solid millage number for model assumptions. |
* No transfer monies from the General or Major Roads Funds. |
Ms. Dalene Sprick, from Rehmann Robson, reviewed an outline for the public education |
initiative and sample timetables (attached to the legislative file) that included the |
following points: |
* Terminology is very important such as: |
- Use the word "initiative" instead of "campaign" to take the politics out . |
- Use the words "residential streets" instead of "local roads" to create more |
* Specifically address the number of miles of road work to be done and the cost per |
mile to repair or reconstruct or overlay the roads. |
Ms. Sprick noted that the first suggested step would be for the Committee to determine |
who will lead the initiative. She discussed the following considerations: |
* City Council Members and Mayor are limited due to political nature of their positions. |
* A citizens support group has the ability of a campaign nature. |
* A task force can consist of staff, committee members and citizens. |
* An outside consultant or staff person is the most viable option. |
* An attorney would review the ballot language for state legislation and city charter |
issues. |
Ms. Sprick suggested a second step would be for the Committee to perform a " |
community attitudinal assessment survey" that includes the following: |
* Ask residents how they become aware of city issues, i.e. where do they get their |
information from so dedicated funding for educating residents can be appropriately |
directed. |
* Determine the underlying crucial community issues and craft the message to deliver |
a better package by using the following: |
- A phone survey could poll about 385 to 400 residents and would cost |
approximately $5,000 to $7,000. |
- Structure the message to be personal and clear for residents to understand |
- Use different messages for different population groups but have an |
- Possibly tie road quality to property values. |
- Develop materials to convey the message such as: |
- Develop media contacts. |
* Distribute materials before absentee ballots are returned and before the election. |
Discussed
Enactment No: RES0279-2004 |
Chairperson Barnett exited at 6:39 PM. Vice Chairperson Duistermars chaired the |
remainder of the meeting. |
Barbara Holder, Jim Duistermars and Michael Kaszubski
Present:
Bryan Barnett and Frank Cosenza
Absent:
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
None was presented.
NEXT MEETING DATE
Special CDV Meeting - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - 5:30 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, Vice Chairperson Duistermars adjourned |
the meeting at 6:49 PM. |
Minutes transcribed by Sue Busam and Denise Mertz. |
NOTE:
Minutes were approved as presented at the August 19, 2004 Regular Community |
Development & Viability Committee Meeting. |