| Acting Chairperson Dziurman commented he was not aware that the proposed |
|
| district had been reduced. Mr. Delacourt explained that at one time there was |
|
| an aerial photo similar to the Stiles School photo, that showed a revised |
|
| proposed district encompassing the office buildings, but eliminating all of the |
|
| manufacturing space. SHPO then pointed out that those parts of the building |
|
| are considered contributing, whereas the additions that were eliminated from the |
|
| Stiles School building were seen as not contributing. So, it seems SHPO was |
|
| more resistant to the revised Twist Drill boundary determination than it was to |
|
| the Stiles School boundary. The revised boundary was drawn by staff only as a |
|
| starting point for discussion if the Committee wanted to consider something |
|
| less then the entire parcel, and is not a recommendation. This boundary can be |
|
| changed to whatever the Committee wishes to recommend, and staff would do |
|
| its best to generate an acceptable boundary description. Mr. Delacourt stated |
|
| he is not sure this approach to this property is ever going to be 100% acceptable |
|
| to SHPO. Whether or not it's acceptable to SHPO, the Committee needs to |
|
| assure that the boundary serves the purpose of protecting the most important |
|
| portions of the resource. SHPO has said that designation is a local decision |
|
| and can be undertaken without their support of a district. So if this reduced |
|