Acting Chairperson Dziurman commented he was not aware that the proposed |
|
district had been reduced. Mr. Delacourt explained that at one time there was |
|
an aerial photo similar to the Stiles School photo, that showed a revised |
|
proposed district encompassing the office buildings, but eliminating all of the |
|
manufacturing space. SHPO then pointed out that those parts of the building |
|
are considered contributing, whereas the additions that were eliminated from the |
|
Stiles School building were seen as not contributing. So, it seems SHPO was |
|
more resistant to the revised Twist Drill boundary determination than it was to |
|
the Stiles School boundary. The revised boundary was drawn by staff only as a |
|
starting point for discussion if the Committee wanted to consider something |
|
less then the entire parcel, and is not a recommendation. This boundary can be |
|
changed to whatever the Committee wishes to recommend, and staff would do |
|
its best to generate an acceptable boundary description. Mr. Delacourt stated |
|
he is not sure this approach to this property is ever going to be 100% acceptable |
|
to SHPO. Whether or not it's acceptable to SHPO, the Committee needs to |
|
assure that the boundary serves the purpose of protecting the most important |
|
portions of the resource. SHPO has said that designation is a local decision |
|
and can be undertaken without their support of a district. So if this reduced |
|