Financial Services Committee
Rochester Hills
1000 Rochester Hills |
Drive |
Rochester Hills, MI 48309 |
Home Page: www. |
rochesterhills.org |
Minutes
Donald Atkinson, Bryan Barnett, John Dalton, Kurt Dawson, Rajeev Gudipati, Melinda Hill, |
Julie Jenuwine, Lang Liu, Lee Zendel |
5:00 PM
1000 Rochester Hills Drive
Thursday, June 24, 2004
DRAFT
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Melinda Hill called the Financial Services Committee meeting to order at 5: |
03 p.m. |
ROLL CALL
Melinda Hill, Bryan Barnett, John Dalton, Donald Atkinson and Lee Zendel
Present:
Non-Voting Members Present: Kurt Dawson, Julie Jenuwine, Rajeev Gudipati |
Non-Voting Members Absent: Lang Lui |
Others Present: Director of Planning Ed Anzek, Director of Building Scott Cope, |
Director of DPS Roger Rousse, Dan Casey and Annette Kingsbury. |
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
No minutes to approve
COMMUNICATIONS
2004-0543
Proposed Budget - 2005
* Julie Jenuwine provided a brief overview and indicated she will have an update in July
Discussed
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
2004-0283
Discussion regarding the need to create a Tax Abatement Policy for the City of |
Rochester Hills |
Tax Abatement Agenda Summary.pdf; Tax Abatement Policy.pdf; Exhibit |
C - RH TAX EXEMPTION CHART.pdf; Exhibit D SMART INVESTMENT |
CHART.pdf; Memo Casey 20040617.pdf; District 02 - Rehab.pdf; District |
03 - Rehab.pdf; District 19.pdf; District 22.pdf; Distric |
Discussion regarding the need to create a Tax Abatement Policy for the City of |
Rochester Hills. |
* Dan Casey reviewed his handout regarding policy comparison, old vs. new. |
A. Tax Abatement Consideration |
1. Old Policy - City does not support the use of tax abatement. In later discussions, |
Council agreed to leave the door open for consideration, which resulted in Texaco |
Ovonic's recently approved application. |
2. New Policy - Council's tax abatement policy clearly defines the parameters in which |
an application will be considered, and uses a matrix for both real and personal property |
as a method to consistently evaluate applications. |
B. Transfer of Employment |
1. Old Policy - Abatements would not be granted for projects that resulted in transfer of |
employment from another Michigan community. |
2. New Policy - Transfer of employment is not a disqualifying factor. This provision is |
based on two factors: |
a. Legislative change to PA 198 in 2000 eliminating transfer of employment provisions |
b. Other Michigan cities that compete with Rochester Hills do not prohibit the transfer of |
employment |
C. Eligible vs. Ineligible Facilities |
1. Old Policy - Eligible facilities must be owner occupied. |
a. Multi-tenant facilities, non-owner occupied, tenant occupied build to suit, or |
speculative facilities will not be considered |
2. New Policy - Eligible facilities can be owner occupied, multi-tenant, leased or |
speculative |
a. PA 198 allows companies in leased facilities, multi-tenant and speculative buildings |
to apply for tax abatement if the facility is in an Industrial Development District. In Troy |
and Southfield, for example, districts often are created for specific suites in multi-tenant |
buildings as opposed to the entire building |
b. Leased equipment also is eligible for abatement as long as the company leasing the |
equipment is responsible for the taxes. |
c. The length of abatement for either real and/or personal property is limited to the |
length of the lease. |
D. Limitations on Length of Abatement |
1. Old Policy - The maximum term for which the Rochester Hills City Council will grant |
abatement is six (6) years for real property and three (3) years for personal property |
2. New Policy - The maximum term for real property is identified in the Tax Exemption |
Chart (Exhibit C) based upon job creation and investment. The law permits a maximum |
of 12 years after completion of the project and up to two (2) years during construction for |
a maximum of 14 years. Personal property abatements also consider job creation and |
investment numbers as identified in Exhibit C, Smart Investment Chart. Because of the |
impact of depreciation on the value of equipment, the Chart limits the length of |
abatement to eight (8) years; however, by law, Council may grant up to 12 years at its |
discretion. |
d. Smart Investment Abatements are intended in part to support the reinvestment and |
diversification of lines of business for Rochester Hills companies, acting as a method of |
local support to strengthen their ability to compete |
e. Some communities limit the length of abatements for real and/or personal property |
to less than the law allows. In some cases, their decisions are based on policies; but |
often it is based on what is politically expedient. |
Discussion regarding existing Industrial Development Districts included the following: |
* Prior rescinded districts are technically still viable based on a recent STC ruling. |
* HB5415 - seeks to give units the power to rescind districts. |
A motion was made by Barnett, seconded by Zendel, that this matter be |
Approved and Referred to the City Council. |
RESOLVED: That the Financial Services Committee requests the City Council |
President schedule the Tax Abatement Policy on a future City Council Work |
Session. |
The motion carried by the following vote: |
Aye:
Hill, Barnett, Dalton, Atkinson and Zendel
NEW BUSINESS
2004-0541
Auditing Services Discussion - Potential RFP
Memo re auditing RFP reviewer.doc
* Julie Jenuwine noted the current agreement with Plante Moran and the City will have |
to go out for RFP or extend the agreement with Plante Moran. |
Quality based analysis will be conducted. |
Discussed
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
None Presented
NEXT MEETING DATE
July 15, 2004 at 5:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, Chairperson Melinda Hill adjourned the |
meeting at 6:00 p.m. |
Minutes prepared by Sue Busam. |
NOTE:
Minutes were approved as presented at the October 21, 2004 Regular Financial |
Services Committee Meeting. |