File #: 2015-0226    Version:
Type: Project Status: Passed
File created: 5/26/2015 In control: City Council Regular Meeting
On agenda: Final action: 7/20/2015
Title: Request for Site Plan Approval - City Walk/City Apartments, a proposed 53-unit apartment building at City Walk, located at the southeast corner of Rochester and Tienken, zoned FB-2, Flexible Business Overlay with a Planned Unit Development Overlay; City Walk, LLC, Applicant
Attachments: 1. 072015 Agenda Summary.pdf, 2. Site Plans.pdf, 3. Staff Report 062615.pdf, 4. Fire review.pdf, 5. Shumejko Memo.pdf, 6. Minutes PC 063015.pdf, 7. Minutes PC 111913.pdf, 8. Minutes PC 043013.pdf, 9. Resolution (Draft).pdf
Title
Request for Site Plan Approval - City Walk/City Apartments, a proposed 53-unit apartment building at City Walk, located at the southeast corner of Rochester and Tienken, zoned FB-2, Flexible Business Overlay with a Planned Unit Development Overlay; City Walk, LLC, Applicant

Body
Resolved, that the Rochester Hills City Council hereby approves the final Site Plans, dated received June 11, 2015 by the Planning and Development Department for City Walk/City Apartments, a 53-unit apartment building and associated accessory structures at City Walk, located at the southeast corner of Rochester and Tienken, zoned FB-2, Flexible Business with a Planned Unit Development Overlay, Parcel No. 15-11-103-009, City Walk, LLC, Applicant, with the following findings and conditions:

Findings:

1. The site plan and supporting documents demonstrate that all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance, as well as other city ordinances, standards and requirements can be met subject to the conditions noted below.

2. The location and design of driveways providing vehicular ingress to and egress from the site will promote safety and convenience of both vehicular and pedestrian traffic both within the site and on adjoining streets.

3. There will be a satisfactory and harmonious relationship between the development on the site and the existing and prospective development of contiguous land and adjacent neighborhoods.

4. The proposed development does not have an unreasonably detrimental, nor an injurious, effect upon the natural characteristics and features of the parcels being developed and the larger area of which the parcels are a part.

5. The proposed final plan promotes the goals and objectives of the Master Plan by offering a variety of housing.

Conditions:

1. Provision of landscape cost estimates to determine the amount of the performance bond, prior to issuance of a Land Improvement Permit.

2. Provision of an irrigation plan and cost estimate, prior to issu...

Click here for full text