File #: 2011-0216    Version:
Type: Project Status: Passed
File created: 4/13/2011 In control: City Council Regular Meeting
On agenda: Final action: 6/6/2011
Title: Request for Revised Conditional Land Use - Proposed patient tower at the southeast side of the existing Crittenton Hospital Medical Center building, zoned SP, Special Purpose, Crittenton Hospital Medical Center, applicant
Attachments: 1. Agenda Summary.pdf, 2. Staff Report.pdf, 3. Map.pdf, 4. Site Plans.pdf, 5. Email Hidden Hills 051711.pdf, 6. Minutes PC 022211.pdf, 7. Minutes PC 050311.pdf, 8. ZBA Staff Report 030911.pdf, 9. Minutes ZBA 030911.pdf, 10. Resolution.pdf

Title

Request for Revised Conditional Land Use - Proposed patient tower at the southeast side of the existing Crittenton Hospital Medical Center building, zoned SP, Special Purpose, Crittenton Hospital Medical Center, applicant

 

Body

Resolved, that the Rochester Hills City Council hereby approves a Revised Conditional Land Use for a patient tower for Crittenton Hospital Medical Center, City File No. 89-153.9, Parcel No. 15-15-101-003, zoned SP, Special Purpose, based on plans dated received by the Planning and Economic Development Department on April 28, 2011 with the following findings:

 

Findings:

 

1.  The proposed Tower addition and other necessary site improvements meet or exceed the standards of the Zoning Ordinance.

 

2.  The existing and expanded use will promote the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.

 

3.  The proposed building has been designed and is proposed to be constructed, operated, maintained and managed so as to be compatible, harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and planned character of the hospital, the general vicinity, adjacent uses of land, the natural environment and the capacity of public services and facilities affected by the land use.

 

4.  The proposal should have a positive impact on the community as a whole and the surrounding area by further meeting the medical needs of people in the area.

 

5.  The proposed development is served adequately by essential public facilities and services, such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage ways and refuse disposal.

 

6.  The proposed development should not be detrimental, hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring land uses, persons, property or the public welfare.

 

7.  The proposal will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services that will be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.