File #: 2014-0502    Version:
Type: Permit Status: Passed
File created: 11/7/2014 In control: City Council Regular Meeting
On agenda: 1/20/2015 Final action: 2/9/2015
Title: Request for Conditional Use Approval for a drive-through at a proposed Taco Bell located west of Crooks and south of Avon Industrial, a 2,159 square-foot restaurant on .63 acres, zoned B-3, Shopping Center Business, Guggenheim Retail Real Estate Partners, Applicant
Attachments: 1. 020915 Agenda Summary.pdf, 2. Staff Report 011615.pdf, 3. Map Aerial.pdf, 4. EIS.pdf, 5. Floor Plans.pdf, 6. Site Plan.pdf, 7. Minutes PC 012015.pdf, 8. Public Hearing Notice.pdf, 9. Resolution (Draft).pdf
Title
Request for Conditional Use Approval for a drive-through at a proposed Taco Bell located west of Crooks and south of Avon Industrial, a 2,159 square-foot restaurant on .63 acres, zoned B-3, Shopping Center Business, Guggenheim Retail Real Estate Partners, Applicant

Body
Resolved, that the Rochester Hills City Council hereby approves a Conditional Use for a drive-through at Taco Bell, located west of Crooks and south of Avon Industrial, a 2,159 square-foot restaurant on .63 acres, zoned B-3, Shopping Center Business, Parcel No. 15-29-276-005, based on plans dated received by the Planning and Economic Development Department on December 22, 2014, Guggenheim Retail Real Estate, Applicant, with the following findings and subject to the following condition.

Findings:

1. The proposed building and other necessary site improvements meet or exceed the standards of the Zoning Ordinance.

2. The expanded use will promote the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.

3. The proposed building has been designed and is proposed to be constructed, operated, maintained, and managed so as to be compatible, harmonious, and appropriate in appearance with the existing and planned character of the general vicinity, adjacent uses of land, and the capacity of public services and facilities affected by the use.

4. The proposal should have a positive impact on the community as a whole and the surrounding area by further offering jobs and another dining option.

5. The proposed development is served adequately by essential public facilities and services, such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage ways, and refuse disposal.

6. The proposed development should not be detrimental, hazardous, or disturbing to existing or future neighboring land uses, persons, property, or the public welfare.

7. The proposal will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services that will be detrimental to the economic welfare of the c...

Click here for full text